The supreme court today modified its judgment in rajesh sharma v. Supreme court has delivered a landmark judgment by changing the basic criteria under section 8 of negotiable instruments act and marked the offence under this act as person specific. Supreme court judgments 2007 april 2007 complete text judgments available for free download now. Di savino v nedbank namibia ltd sa 242010 2012 nasc 3.
The supreme court has ruled that a person cannot be convicted for merely demanding dowry unless the demand is followed by mental or. He argued, however, that this did not prevent the supreme court from reversing its own decision in a subsequent case. A two judge bench of justices ak goel and uu lalit observed that. This appeal takes exception to the final judgment and order dated 21. Subsequently, the high court held in its judgment dated 20. High court, vide interim order, directed the respondent to keep her under surveillance and to ensure that she was not taken out of the country without further orders of the court. Attachment before judgment is levied where the court on an application of the plaintiff is satisfied that the defendant, with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against him a is about to dispose of the whole or any. Section 38 of the code provides that a decree may be executed either by the court which passed it or by the court to which it is sent for execution section 42 of the code indicates that the transferee court to which the decree is transferred for execution will have the same powers in executing that decree as if it had been passed by itself. The judges of the constitutional court also published a press statement that they had done so. Cit appeals relying upon decision of supreme court in cit vs. Rowan bailey v the attorney general of antigua and barbuda.
Sep 02, 2017 20170902 the supreme court of kenya on friday september annulled the presidential election by a majority decision and gave an order that a fresh poll be conducted in the next 60 days. The supreme court noted that imprisonment necessarily affected some a prisoners rights, including the right to dignity. State of west bengal and others supreme court of india date of judgment. Below you will find the latest judgments handed down by the supreme court. This matter had also come up for consideration in various court cases both before the high courts and the supreme court and in several cases the relevant judgment had brought out the inappropriateness of direct recruits of later years becoming senior to promotees with long years of service. Article 226 extraordinary jurisdiction exercise of quashing of fir justified if allegations made in fir do not constitute any offence. Despite the need for clear guidance on the implementation of aia trials, most such appeals are being decided by. After hearing the parties, the high court by judgment and order dated 2nd november, 2000, held that it is the function of the parliament to make necessary amendments in the representation of the people act, 1951 or the election rules and, therefore, court cannot pass any order, as. This judgment, therefore, may be viewed as a baseline for the supreme courts perception of matters political, as these interplay with the progressive terms. A third petition for writ of certiorari to the united states supreme court has now been filed stemming from the federal circuits rule 36 debacle. In re advisory opinion to the house of representatives casino ii. Gaston browne prime minister of antigua and barbuda et al.
Iii concomitant right being part of the fundamental rights but main or central right not being a fundamental right, being only a statutory right breach of concomitant fundamental right, held, is a breach of. For the purposes of this section, dowry death, shall have the same meaning as in section 304b of the indian penal code 45 of 1860. We have received from the honorable house of representatives a resolution. Home collegium resolutions case status judgments vernacular judgments causelist daily orders office report copying caveat efiling. Judgment montgomery appellant v lanarkshire health board respondent scotland before lord neuberger, president lady hale, deputy president lord kerr lord clarke lord wilson lord reed lord hodge judgment given on 11 march 2015 heard on 22 and 23 july 2014.
A summary of the supreme court verdict on section 377. Argued april 28, 2015decided june 26, 2015 michigan, kentucky, ohio, and tennessee define marriage as a union between one man and. The high court, on the other hand, did not discuss the merit of the matter so far as the appellant is concerned but concentrated on the role played by his mother mohinder kaur and came to the finding that she did not accept any dowry. This did not, however, mean that a prisoner did not have the right to dignity. Kamwi v law society of namibia sca 32009 2010 nasc 16. In the high court of the republic of singapore 2017 sghc 297 suit no 822 of 2015 between alphire group pte ltd plaintiff and law chau loon defendant. Khieu samphan and arthur vercken in the courtroom on 7 august 2014, waiting for the pronouncement of the verdict in case 00201. April 2007 supreme court of india judgments supreme. The polish legislation concerning the lowering of the.
Judgment in appeal no 168 of 2010 proceedings, ntpc has given undertaking that it will not press for some of the issues including this issue before the central. On 16th october, i came to know that with reference to civil case no. Judgments are delivered orally by justices in the courtroom. Kindly go through the supreme court judgement about us 8 ni act. Following the judgment in modi cements case, in this case supreme court sc held that section 8 gets attracted, even if the drawer has given instruction for stop payment. To chain a person was a humiliating experience which reduces the person. These fundamental rights cannot be given or taken away by law, and all laws and executive actions must abide by them. The appellant herein challenges the order passed by the high court whereby the petition filed by. Supreme court of india on thursday has issued new set of directions to prevent the misuse of section 498a of indian penal code. Appellant was not relative in any manner as referred to in section 498a, ipc no caseis made out for her prosecution under section 498a.
Aug 31, 2017 supreme court has delivered a landmark judgment by changing the basic criteria under section 8 of negotiable instruments act and marked the offence under this act as person specific. The supreme court on tuesday held that foreign law firms and lawyers cannot practise in the country, even as it allowed casual visits by foreign lawyers on a fly in and fly out. Irene liakakos, the court on june 19, 2015, issued the following order. The mother filed an appeal to the united states supreme court against the decision of the court of appeals, asking that her case be consolidated with that of. However, the court of appeal took the unusual step of itself granting the local authority permission to appeal to this court. The appellant herein challenges the order passed by the high court whereby the. Additionally, the court stipulates that the directions are to be complied with within a span of six months. We are fighting an ancestral property case in mysore. The kenyan supreme court released the full judgment pdf following the justices unanimous dismissal of raila odingas petition challenging the election of president uhuru kenyatta. Dec 19, 2016 the supreme court had to consider the following questions arising from the judgement of the karnataka high court in yokogawa india ltd 341 itr 385 kar.
Montgomery appellant v lanarkshire health board respondent. The high court, on the other hand, did not discuss the merit of the matter so far as the appellant is. Mempa petitioned the washington supreme court for a writ of habeas corpus and claimed that he was denied his right to counsel during the proceedings revoking his probation. The judgment today was rendered by chief justice of india dipak misra and justices am khanwilkar and dy chandrachud.
It acknowledged that there are growing instances of women filing false charge. Is there a shift in the recent judgments of apex court in cheque bouncing cases under ni act. Namunjepo and the others then appealed to the supreme court. Mar 22, 2016 from many years supreme court has been giving judgments on section 498a of indian penal code where court has also found that this section has been misused by many women and thus asked the law ministry to consider amending the same. In the latest judgement delivered on september 14, 2018, the supreme court has modified the guidelines laid down by it in rajesh sharma and others v. Supreme court judgment on the presidential election petition 20. Home dowry death dowry death latest judgements of supreme court high courts. The high court decided in favour of the commanding officer, windhoek prison and the minister of prisons and correctional services. April 2007 supreme court judgments case laws decisions with latest updates.
Supreme court judgment on the presidential election. Learn business law cases, supreme court case, high court case study, and more with flashcards, games, and other court case example tools. A summary of the supreme court verdict on section 377 brief background section 377 of the indian penal code, 1860 makes certain acts illegal. It is further relevant to note that this petition was earlier rejected by the honble high court of delhi on the ground of lack of cause of action. The section seems neutral in that it criminalizes certain sexual acts and not people and their identities.
Curiously enough, the high court propounded a theory which was. To the honorable house of representatives of the state of rhode island and providence plantations. Under that law, the retirement age for supreme court judges was. The referring court must ascertain whether the new disciplinary. Giving the leading judgment, mcfarlane lj commented that artificially to limit the judicial exercise in a. The expert committee report in itself provides for recommendations under numerous heads. The high court passed an interim order permitting the lessees to carry on mining operations and the mining business in the concessions for which renewal applications had been filed under rule 24a of the mc rules. Key judgments 19902000 legal assistance centrenamibia. On appeal to this court and having considered the record of proceedings in the court below and hearing argument on the merits of the appeal, this court issued an order in the following terms. The defect may, nevertheless be cured by reference to other documents relating to the proceedings that are properly before the court.
Ltd v kolliasthe court held that the principle that is involvedin deciding whether or not to grant summary judgment is to look at the matter at the end of the day on all the documents that. Supreme court cannot set aside own judgment akpedeye, san. More so, the appellate court should not modify the decree of the trial court by a cryptic order without taking note of all relevant aspects, otherwise the order of the appellate court would fall short of considerations expected from the first appellate court in view of the provisions of order xli, rule 31 cpc and such judgment and order would. Home news supreme court cannot set aside own judgment akpedeye, san supreme court cannot set aside own judgment akpedeye, san on july 14, 2016 12. Is there a shift in the recent judgments of apex court in. Supreme court landmark judgment on anticipatory bail. It is an archaic colonial law that was brought in by the british. From many years supreme court has been giving judgments on section 498a of indian penal code where court has also found that this section has been misused by many women and thus asked the law ministry to consider amending the same. The averments made by the father in the writ petition need not be stated in detail. The order of 29 august 2012 remains in force and the mother is in breach of it. However, the precautions taken by the legislator has not stopped the filing of false cases by women and though the section has helped a number of women facing cruelty, it has also been misused by a number of them. Shirpur education society through its principal vs.
Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Supreme court judgments 2007 laws in india, supreme court. Union of india, which had laid down safeguards for the prevention of misuse of section 498a of the indian penal code. Case announcements colorado supreme court monday, october 2, 2017 slip opinions are the opinions delivered by the supreme court justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. He held that shareholders had shown low income in income tax returns which was much less compared to investment in share capital. Modifications to previously posted opinions will be linked to the case number in the petition for rehearing section the day the. This batch of writ petitions and transferred cases relate to mining in the state of goa and as issues raised are common to the writ petitions and the transferred cases, the cases have been analogously heard and are. The instant appeal is directed against judgment dated november 23, 2006, rendered by the learned single judge of punjab and haryana high court, in criminal appeal no.
The supreme court had to consider the following questions arising from the judgement of the karnataka high court in yokogawa india ltd 341 itr 385 kar. The only substantive judgment was delivered by underhill lj. The supreme court of india in sushil kumar sharma vs. Giving the leading judgment, mcfarlane lj commented that artificially to limit the judicial exercise in a manner which invites the court to. Case announcements colorado supreme court tuesday, january 17, 2017 slip opinions are the opinions delivered by the supreme court justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Through this judgment, sc provides relief to the holder of a bounced cheque, due to insufficient funds in the payers account. I 2005 held that any misuse of this provision of law amounts to unleashing legal terrorism. Supreme court landmark judgment on anticipatory bail criminal law code of criminal procedure, 1974 2 of 1974 gurbaksh singh sibbia v the state of punjab air 1980 supreme court 1632 y. Mempa pled guilty to the burglary charge, and the court revoked mempas probation and sentenced him to ten years in prison. The nalsa judgement propounds that the directions issued by the court have to be read harmoniously with the expert committee report. Examples and case studies showing the value created by legal case studies examples start studying supreme court case studies. Foreign law firms cant practise in india, rules supreme court. Supreme court judgments on section 498a of ipc lawyers law. Seng foo building construction pte ltd v public prosecutor 2016 sghc 243 high court magistrates appeal no 9099 of 2015 sundaresh menon cj 12 july 2016.
431 922 19 271 225 1480 1341 753 1186 760 138 1473 1406 580 383 967 23 179 1304 797 505 95 142 270 1332 1500 212 573 337 1392 832 1383 916 1330 1244 1453 180 437 42 1468 430 146 702 1165